People vary in their capacity for accepting doubt, especially of cherished beliefs, and they also vary in how much of themselves they are willing to doubt. The belief that our experience, our education, our status and our upbringing are proofs and guarantees is vanity. Although never easy, it seems clear that erasing some aspect of attributes-of-self is necessary. In "Fear and Trembling," Kierkegaard quotes Luke 14:26: "If anyone comes to me and does not hate his father and mother, his wife and children, his brothers and sisters-yes, even his own life-he cannot be my disciple"
What does one trust? I have considered this question for a long time but neither the question nor its implications have become easier. Sometime ago I read Alan Watts: "To have faith is to trust yourself to the water. When you swim you don't grab hold of the water, because if you do you will sink and drown. Instead you relax and float."
Relax and float.
Yet, while relaxing and floating are necessary, they are not sufficient; at least not for doing something interesting and meaningful-admittedly values. To do, and perhaps also to be, something interesting and meaningful, passion and faith must exist as well. Art, like life, depends part on desperate passion and faith amid unshakable doubts. A leap of faith must not only be taken despite doubt but in fact depends on those doubts. This is no leap without doubts.
While faith-the confidence of a better condition-is probably always spiritual in essence, ought not to be religious in practice, in discipline. Of course, without religious doctrine, as if the case in art, passion and faith often become soft and end up being more attributes of vanity. In my view, the crucial word in the previous paragraph is "desperate."
Radical doubting.
People vary in their capacity for accepting doubt, especially of cherished beliefs, and they also vary in how much of themselves they are willing to doubt.
from the blog of enrique martinez celaya www.martinezcelaya.com